StacksVerified U.S. regulatory reference

50 CFR §80.68

Verified against eCFR.gov as of June 20, 2026View official text on eCFR.gov ↗
Yes. Each coastal State's fish and wildlife agency must equitably allocate the funds apportioned under the Sport Fish Restoration Act between projects with benefits for marine fisheries and projects with benefits for freshwater fisheries.
  1. (a)The subprograms authorized by the Sport Fish Restoration Act do not have to allocate funding in the same manner if the State fish and wildlife agency allocates Sport Fish Restoration funds equitably between marine and freshwater fisheries.
  2. (b)The coastal States for purposes of this allocation are:
    1. (1)Alabama, Alaska, California, Connecticut, Delaware, Florida, Georgia, Hawaii, Louisiana, Maine, Maryland, Massachusetts, Mississippi, New Hampshire, New Jersey, New York, North Carolina, Oregon, Rhode Island, South Carolina, Texas, Virginia, and Washington;
    2. (2)The Commonwealths of Puerto Rico and the Northern Mariana Islands; and
    3. (3)The Territories of Guam, the U.S. Virgin Islands, and American Samoa.