(a)
(b)
Editorial Notes
Prior Provisions
Provisions similar to those in this section were contained in section 2581 of Title 50, War and National Defense, prior to repeal by Pub. L. 119–60, §3111(b)(1).
Statutory Notes and Related Subsidiaries
Office of Environmental Management Program-Wide Performance Metrics for Reducing Risk
Pub. L. 119–60, div. C, title XXXI, §3124, Dec. 18, 2025, 139 Stat. 1467, provided that:
"(a)
"(1) develop and implement program performance metrics for the Office of Environmental Management (referred to in this section as the 'Office'), in addition to the program performance metrics identified in the plan published by the Office of Environmental Management entitled 'EM Program Plan 2022'; and
"(2) revise the program performance metrics identified in the 'EM Program Plan 2022' in accordance with the requirements of subsection (b).
"(b)
"(1)
"(A) align with the goals and mission of the Department of Energy (referred to in this section as the 'Department') and the Office;
"(B) link to the other metrics developed or revised under subsection (a) and any other existing performance metrics of the Department and the Office; and
"(C) be clearly communicated throughout the Department and the Office.
"(2)
"(3)
"(4)
"(5)
"(6)
"(7)
"(8)
"(9)
"(c)
"(1) give first priority to addressing any issues posing an immediate risk to human health or the environment;
"(2) give second priority, as appropriate, to addressing issues based on achieving the highest risk reduction benefit per radioactive or hazardous content removed; and
"(3) measure the amount of radioactivity or hazardous content removed, as determined by—
"(A) curies, rads, or rems;
"(B) pounds of hazardous content removed; or
"(C) such other appropriate measure.
"(d)
"(1)
"(2)
Office of Environmental Management Integrated Radioactive Waste Disposal Planning and Optimization
Pub. L. 119–60, div. C, title XXXI, §3125, Dec. 18, 2025, 139 Stat. 1469, provided that:
"(a)
"(1)
"(2)
"(A) incorporate modeling to identify optimal disposal pathways and schedules that could be achieved, in consideration of—
"(i) regulatory constraints; and
"(ii) legal binding agreements; and
"(B) identify strategic alternatives to radioactive waste disposal plans and schedules.
"(b)
"(1)
"(2)
"(A) include, to the maximum extent practicable, optimal radioactive waste disposal pathways and schedules identified through the analysis conducted pursuant to subsection (a);
"(B) identify specific opportunities for further optimization of radioactive waste disposal pathways and schedules that might be achieved through changes in regulatory constraints;
"(C) address complex-wide disposal issues, such as waste with no disposal pathway; and
"(D) incorporate feedback from key stakeholders, including Federal and State regulators and operators of radioactive waste disposal facilities.
"(c)
"(1)
"(2)
"(d)
"(1) the results of the optimization analysis required by subsection (a);
"(2) the nationwide disposal plan required by subsection (b); and
"(3) the initial activities of the forum established pursuant to subsection (c).
"(e)
"(f)
"(1) The term 'complex' means the set of sites across the United States where radioactive waste cleanup and disposal activities are managed by the Office of Environmental Management.
"(2) The term 'integrated' means inclusive of all radioactive waste across the complex.
"(3) The term 'optimal' means the best possible outcome, such as the lowest cost or highest profit, while following specific rules and limitations.
"(4) The term 'regulatory constraints' means requirements included in regulations or agreements with regulators that affect decisions regarding radioactive waste disposal pathways and schedules by the Office of Environmental Management."
1 So in original. Probably should be "Defense Environmental Cleanup Account".