AGENCY:

Office of the Comptroller of the Currency (OCC), Treasury.

ACTION:

Request for information.

SUMMARY:

On January 9, 2020, the OCC and the Federal Deposit Insurance Corporation (the agencies) published a notice of proposed rulemaking that would amend their regulations implementing the Community Reinvestment Act (CRA). The OCC seeks public input with this request for information to assist in determining how the proposed rule might be revised to ensure that the final rule better achieves the statute's purpose of encouraging banks to help serve their communities by making the framework more objective, transparent, consistent, and easy to understand. Specifically, this request for information seeks bank-specific data and information to supplement currently-available data and to inform potential revisions to modernize and strengthen the CRA regulatory framework.

DATES:

Comments should be submitted by March 10, 2020.

ADDRESSES:

You may submit comments to the OCC by any of the methods set forth below. Commenters are encouraged to submit comments through the Federal eRulemaking Portal or email, if possible. Please use the title “Community Reinvestment Act; Request for Information” to facilitate the organization and distribution of the comments. You may submit comments by any of the following methods:

• Federal eRulemaking Portal—“Regulations.gov”: Go to www.regulations.gov. Enter “Docket ID OCC-2019-0029” in the Search Box and click “Search.” Click on “Comment Now” to submit public comments.
• Click on the “Help” tab on the Regulations.gov home page to get information on using Regulations.gov, including instructions for submitting public comments.
• Email: rfi.cra@occ.treas.gov.
• Mail: Chief Counsel's Office, Attention: RFI CRA Comment Processing, Office of the Comptroller of the Currency, 400 7th Street SW, Suite 3E-218, Washington, DC 20219.
• Hand Delivery/Courier: 400 7th Street SW, Suite 3E-218, Washington, DC 20219.

Instructions: You must include “OCC” as the agency name and “Docket ID OCC-2019-0029” in your comment.

In general, the OCC will enter all comments received into the docket and publish the comments on the Regulations.gov website without change, including any business or personal information that you provide such as name and address information, email addresses, or phone numbers. Comments received, including attachments and other supporting materials, are part of the public record and subject to public disclosure.

Respondents may designate information as confidential or request confidential treatment. The OCC will treat confidential commercial information submitted to the agency in accordance with 12 CFR 4.16 consistent with Food Marketing Institute v. Argus Leader Media, 139 S.Ct. 2356, 2363 (2019) and applicable guidance issued by the Department of Justice at https://www.justice.gov/​oip/​step-step-guide-determining-if-commercial-or-financial-information-obtained-person-confidential. The OCC may aggregate the information, use the aggregated information, and make the aggregated information public.

You may review comments and other related materials that pertain to this rulemaking action by any of the following methods:

• Viewing Comments Electronically: Go to www.regulations.gov. Enter “Docket ID OCC-2019-0029” in the Search box and click “Search.” Click on “Open Docket Folder” on the right side of the screen. Comments and supporting materials can be viewed and filtered by clicking on “View all documents and comments in this docket” and then using the filtering tools on the left side of the screen.
• Click on the “Help” tab on the Regulations.gov home page to get information on using Regulations.gov. The docket may be viewed after the close of the comment period in the same manner as during the comment period.
• Viewing Comments Personally: You may personally inspect comments at the OCC, 400 7th Street SW, Washington, DC 20219. For security reasons, the OCC requires that visitors make an appointment to inspect comments. You may do so by calling (202) 649-6700 or, for persons who are deaf or hearing impaired, TTY, (202) 649-5597. Upon arrival, visitors will be required to present valid government-issued photo identification and submit to security screening in order to inspect comments.

FOR FURTHER INFORMATION CONTACT:

Ioan Voicu, Director, Compliance Risk Analysis Division, at (202) 649-5550; or Daniel Sufranski, Attorney, or Jean Xiao, Attorney, Chief Counsel's Office, (202) 649-5490; Office of the Comptroller of the Currency, 400 7th Street SW, Washington, DC 20219. For persons who are deaf or hearing impaired, TTY users may contact (202) 649-5597.

SUPPLEMENTARY INFORMATION:

I. Background

On January 9, 2020, the agencies issued a notice of proposed rulemaking that would make comprehensive changes to the CRA regulatory framework to ensure that the CRA remains a relevant and powerful tool for encouraging banks to serve the needs of their communities, particularly low- or moderate-income (LMI) neighborhoods, consistent with the banks' safe and sound operations. As the proposed rule describes, there is broad recognition that the CRA regulations should be improved both in design and in application. Accordingly, the agencies proposed to modernize and strengthen the CRA regulatory framework to better achieve the underlying statutory purpose of encouraging banks to help serve their communities by making the framework more objective, transparent, consistent, and easy to understand. To accomplish these goals, the proposed rule seeks to strengthen the CRA regulations in four key areas by (1) clarifying which activities qualify for CRA credit; (2) updating where activities count for CRA credit; (3) creating a more transparent and objective method for measuring CRA performance; and (4) providing for more transparent, consistent, and timely CRA-related data collection, recordkeeping, and reporting.

II. Request for Information

The OCC gives notice that it seeks public input to assist in determining how the proposed rule should be revised to ensure that the final rule better achieves the statute's purpose of encouraging banks to help serve their communities by making the framework more objective, consistent, and transparent. As discussed in the proposed rule, the agencies analyzed currently-available historical data to determine the empirical benchmarks and thresholds that would be used in the general performance standards in § 25.12 of the proposed rule. Specifically, the agencies reviewed the available Home Mortgage Disclosure Act (HMDA) data on home mortgages to LMI borrowers, Call Report data on the on-balance sheet value of home mortgages, consumer loans, small business and small farm loans, and credit bureau data on the outstanding balances of consumer loans. The agencies analyzed these sources together, collected additional information about community development investments from historical performance evaluations, and made some assumptions to estimate what banks' average CRA evaluation measures would have been from 2011-2017 under the proposed rule's framework.

This request for information seeks bank-specific data and information to supplement the agencies' analyses and currently-available data. Specifically, it requests four types of bank data or information: (1) Retail domestic deposit activities; (2) qualifying activity data; (3) data on retail loans originated and sold within 90 days; and (4) other retail loan data. This data should reflect the past three years. Responses to this request are informed by a review of the proposed rule.

Respondents may answer all or some of the requests for information below. All information should be in a comma delimited file, and dollar values should be in 1,000s. Standard Federal Information Processing Standards (FIPS) codes should be used for geographic data, and the following codes should be used, unless otherwise instructed:

• -99—Information not available
• -98—Not applicable (e.g., geographic area is not part of a facility-based assessment area)
• -9999—Not part of a metropolitan statistical area

The OCC is particularly interested in receiving information and supporting data on the following topics and questions:

Retail Domestic Deposit Activities

As discussed in the proposed rule, a bank's main office and deposit-taking facility locations and retail domestic deposit data would be required to determine its assessment area delineations, its ratings, and the benchmarks associated with ratings in §§ 25.08 and 25.11 of the proposed rule. The following data will supplement existing data and assist the OCC in, among other things, making potential revisions to the proposed thresholds in § 25.12.

Questions and Requests Regarding Retail Domestic Deposit Activities

1. What are the bank's total amount of retail domestic deposits received, by county for each quarter-end? As discussed in § 25.03 of the proposed rule, retail domestic deposits would include deposits by individuals, partnerships, and corporations, as reported on Schedule RC-E, item 1, of the Call Report other than a deposit that is obtained, directly or indirectly, from or through the mediation or assistance of a deposit broker as that term is defined in section 29 of the Federal Deposit Insurance Act (12 U.S.C. 1831f(g)). The county should be assigned based on the accountholder's physical address, not the location of the branch that accepted the deposit.

2. Assign and provide a unique numerical identification (ID) to each facility-based assessment area, as defined in the proposed rule. As discussed in § 25.08 of the proposed rule, a bank's main office, branches, and non-branch deposit-taking facilities, as well as the surrounding geographies in which the bank has originated or purchased a substantial portion of its loans, would be included in the facility-based assessment area. Facility based assessment areas would be comprised of one of the following that include one or more of the bank's main office, branches, and non-branch deposit-taking facilities: (1) A whole metropolitan statistical area (MSA); (2) the whole nonmetropolitan area of a state; (3) one or more whole, contiguous metropolitan divisions (MD) in a single MSA; or (4) one or more whole, contiguous counties or county equivalents in a single MSA or nonmetropolitan area.

3. For the data above, provide county, MD/MSA, and State standard FIPS Codes.

4. Are there burdens associated with collecting or reporting the data described in this section?

Total Qualifying Activities

As discussed in the proposed rule and this request for information, the dollar value of a bank's qualifying activities would be required to determine a bank's ratings and to set the benchmarks associated with ratings in § 25.12. The following data will supplement existing data and assist the OCC in, among other things, making potential revisions to the appropriate thresholds in the proposed rule.

Questions and Requests Regarding Total Qualifying Activities

5. Calculate and report the sum, at the county level, of all quarter-end balances for each type of qualifying loan or community development (CD) investment held on the balance sheet. Calculate and report the sum of the associated dollar value, at the county level, for other CD investments (i.e., monetary and in-kind donations) and CD services made or provided in each quarter. Exclude from the calculation any loans that were sold within 90 days of origination by the bank. Qualifying activity would mean an activity that meets the criteria in § 25.04 of the proposed rule. Qualifying activities would include qualifying loans, CD investments, and CD services. Qualifying loan means a retail loan, as defined in § 25.03, that meets the criteria in § 25.04(b) or a CD loan, as defined in § 25.03, that meets the criteria in § 25.04(c). CD investments are defined in § 25.03, which would include a requirement that the investment meets the criteria in § 25.04(c). CD services are defined in § 25.03, which would include a requirement that the service meets the criteria in § 25.04(c).

6. Are there burdens associated with collecting or reporting the data described in this section?

Qualifying Retail Loans Originated and Sold Within 90 Days

As discussed in the proposed rule, the value of a bank's qualifying activities would be required to determine a bank's ratings and to set the benchmarks associated with ratings in § 25.12. Retail loans originated and sold within 90 days that are qualifying activities would be valued at 25 percent of their origination value under § 25.06(d)(2). The following data will supplement existing data and assist the OCC in, among other things, making potential revisions to the appropriate thresholds in proposed rule.

Questions and Requests Regarding Qualifying Retail Loans Originated and Sold Within 90 Days

7. Report all retail loans that are qualifying activities under § 25.04 and that are originated and sold within 90 days of origination.

8. Report the balance at origination of all retail loans reported in request 7.

9. Report the origination date of each retail loan reported in request 7.

10. Report the sell date of each retail loan reported in 7.

11. Instead of reporting the information in questions 7 through 10, report the aggregate balance at origination of all retail loans that are qualifying activities under § 25.04 and that are originated and sold within 90 days of origination throughout the year.

12. What are the burdens associated with collecting or reporting the data described in this section? How do the burdens differ if the data is collected at the loan level versus the aggregate level?

Volume of Retail Loans by Census Tract

As discussed in the proposed rule and this request for information, banks would be evaluated under retail lending distribution tests described in § 25.11 of the proposed rule. The following data will supplement existing data relevant to the proposed retail lending distribution tests.

Questions and Requests Regarding Volume of Retail Loans by Census Tract

12. Calculate the total number and dollar volume, at the census tract level, of all new retail loans originated for each of the bank's retail loan product lines. Retail lending product line would be defined in § 25.03 to include home mortgage loans, small loans to businesses, small loans to farms, automobile loans, credit card loans, other revolving credit lines, and other consumer loans (as those terms would be defined in under the proposed rule).

13. For product lines other than small loans to businesses and small loans to farms, calculate the total number, at the census tract level, of all new retail loans originated for each retail loan product line to LMI individuals or families. For the small loans to businesses and small loans to farms product lines, as defined in § 25.04, calculate, at the census tract level, the number of small loans originated to small businesses and to small farms, respectively.

14. Using the same set of unique assessment area IDs as in Table 1, identify each facility-based assessment area.

15. Report the Census Tract, County, MSA/MD, State.

16. Are there burdens associated with collecting or reporting the data described in this section?