40 CFR Table 12
Data Requirements for New and Existing Continuous Lamination Lines and Continuous Casting Lines Complying With a Lbs/Ton Organic HAP Emissions Limit on a Per Line Basis
June 9, 2020
As required in §63.5865(b), in order to comply with a lbs/ton organic HAP emissions limit for continuous lamination lines and continuous casting lines you must determine the data in the following table:
Open Table
| For each line where the wet- out area . . . | And the oven . . . | You must determine . . . |
|---|---|---|
| 1. Is uncontrolled | a. Is uncontrolled | i. Annual uncontrolled wet-out area organic HAP emissions, ii. Annual uncontrolled oven organic HAP emissions, and iii. Annual neat resin plus and neat gel coat plus applied. |
| 2. Has an enclosure that is not a PTE and the captured organic HAP emissions are controlled by an add-on control device | a. Is uncontrolled | i. Annual uncontrolled wet-out area organic HAP emissions, ii. Annual controlled wet-out area organic HAP emissions, iii. Annual uncontrolled oven organic HAP emissions, |
| iv. The capture efficiency of the wet-out area enclosure, v. The destruction efficiency of the add-on control device, and vi. The amount of neat resin plus and neat gel coat plus applied. |
||
| 3. Has an enclosure that is a PTE, and the captured organic HAP emissions are controlled by an add-on control device | a. Is uncontrolled | i. Annual uncontrolled wet-out area organic HAP emissions, ii. Annual controlled wet-out area organic HAP emissions, iii. Annual uncontrolled oven organic HAP emissions, |
| iv. That the wet-out area enclosure meets the requirements of EPA Method 204 of appendix M to 40 CFR part 51 for a PTE, v. The destruction efficiency of the add-on control device, and vi. The amount of neat resin plus and neat gel coat plus applied. |
||
| 4. Is uncontrolled | a. Is controlled by an add-on control device | i. Annual uncontrolled wet-out area organic HAP emissions, ii. Annual uncontrolled oven organic HAP emissions, iii. Annual controlled oven organic HAP emissions, |
| iv. The capture efficiency of the oven, v. The destruction efficiency of the add-on control device, and vi. The amount of neat resin plus and neat gel coat plus applied. |
||
| 5. Has an enclosure that is not a PTE and the captured organic HAP emissions are controlled by an add-on control device | a. Is controlled by an add-on control device | i. Annual uncontrolled wet-out area organic HAP emissions, ii. Annual controlled wet-out area organic HAP emissions, iii. Annual uncontrolled oven organic HAP emissions, |
| iv. Annual controlled oven organic HAP emissions, v. The capture efficiency of the wet-out area enclosure, vi. The capture efficiency of the oven, |
||
| vii. The destruction efficiency of the add-on control device, and viii. The amount of neat resin plus and neat gel coat plus applied. |
||
| 6. Has an enclosure that is a PTE, and the captured organic HAP emissions are controlled by add-on control device | a. Is controlled by an add-on control device | i. That the wet-out area enclosure meets the requirements of EPA Method 204 of appendix M to 40 CFR part 51 for a PTE, ii. The capture efficiency of the oven, iii. Inlet organic HAP emissions to the an add-on control device, and |
| iv. Outlet organic HAP emissions from the add-on control device. |
Tried the LawStack mobile app?
Join thousands and try LawStack mobile for FREE today.
- Carry the law offline, wherever you go.
- Download CFR, USC, rules, and state law to your mobile device.
