(1) In generalNot later than 2 years after August 8, 2005, the Secretary shall enter into a contract with the National Academy of Sciences for, and the National Academy of Sciences shall conduct and submit to Congress a report on, a study on the feasibility of converting motor vehicle trips to bicycle trips. (2) ComponentsThe study shall— (A) document the results or progress of the

Pub. L. 110–140, Dec. 19, 2007, 121 Stat. 1607, which enacted this part, amended sections 6832, 6834, 8253, and 8254 of this title, and enacted provisions set out as a note under section 6834 of this title. For complete classification of subtitle C to the Code, see Tables.

lands withdrawn by the order. (b) The denial of a withdrawal application, in whole or in part, shall result in the termination of the segregative effect of the application or proposal as to those lands where the withdrawal is disallowed. Within 30 days following the decision to disallow the application or proposal, in whole or in part, the authorized officer shall publish a notice in the Federal Register specifying the reasons for the

§ 1610.1 Resource management planning guidance. (a) Guidance for preparation and amendment of resource management plans may be provided by the Director and State Director, as needed, to help the Field Manager and staff prepare a specific plan. Such guidance may include the following: (1) National level policy which has been established

(2) The objection must: (i) State the reasons for the objection; and (ii) Include any supporting documentation showing why the fair market value should be modified. (3) You must provide copies of the written objection and any supporting documentation to all parties who have an interest in the purchase of the property. (c) Any party who

50042, Aug. 30, 2007. § 134.220 Prohibition against ex parte communications. No person shall consult or communicate with a Judge concerning any fact, question of law, or SBA policy relevant to the merits of a case before that Judge except on prior notice to all parties, and with the opportunity for all parties to

50042, Aug. 30, 2007. § 134.918 Judicial review. The publication of a final rule in the Federal Register is considered the final agency action for purposes of seeking judicial review. {"origins":[{"level":"part","identifier

50042, Aug. 30, 2007. § 134.1110 New evidence. Except for good cause shown, evidence beyond the case file will not be admitted. {"origins":[{"level":"part","identifier":"134","label_level":"Part 134","hierarchy":{"title":"13","chapter":"I","part":"134

50042, Aug. 30, 2007. § 134.1302 Who may appeal a HUBZone status protest determination? Appeals from HUBZone status protest determinations may be filed with OHA by the protested concern, the protester, or the contracting officer responsible for the procurement affected by the protest determination.

may have resulted from adherence to these policies and practices. (d) Availability of self-evaluation and related materials. Recipients shall maintain on file for at least three years following completion of the evaluation required under paragraph (c) of this section, and shall provide to the designated agency official

50042, Aug. 30, 2007. § 134.702 Who may appeal? Appeals from WOSB or EDWOSB protest determinations may be filed with OHA by the protested concern, the protestor, or the contracting officer responsible for the procurement affected by the protest determination.

50042, Aug. 30, 2007. § 134.708 What is the standard of review? The standard of review for an appeal of a WOSB or EDWOSB protest determination is whether the D/GC's determination was based on clear error of fact or law. {"origins":[{"level":"part

§ 41.220 Admissions. (a) Admissions to educational institutions prior to June 24, 1973, are not covered by these Title IX regulations. (b) Administratively separate units. For the purposes only of this section,

indirectly; and (16) The need to deter the defendant and others from engaging in the same or similar misconduct. (c) Nothing in this section shall be construed to limit the ALJ or the Director from considering any other factors that in any given case may mitigate or aggravate the offense for which penalties and assessments are imposed. {"origins":[{"level":"part

50042, Aug. 30, 2007. § 134.1308 What is the standard of review? The standard of review for an appeal of a HUBZone status protest determination is whether the D/HUB's determination was based on clear error of fact or law. The appellant has the burden of proof, by a preponderance of the evidence.

of business as a result of one or more essential employees being called up to active service for a period of more than 30 consecutive days, and a loan in excess of $2 million is necessary to reopen or keep open the small business; and (c) Your small business has used all reasonably available funds from the small business, its affiliates, its principal owners and all available credit elsewhere (as described in

Committee on Agriculture, Nutrition, and Forestry of the Senate, a report on the following: (1) The findings of the advisory committee's assessment under subsection (b). (2) The advisory committee's recommendations for ways to improve the Initiative. (d) Application of Federal Advisory Committee Act

purpose for which the SBA intends to use the information; (3) The routine uses the SBA may make of the information; and (4) The effects on the individual, if any, of not providing the information; (d) Ensure that the office maintains no system of records without public notice and that it notifies appropriate SBA officials of the existence or development of any system of records that is not the

grants, in the aggregate, among the States, taking into account the needs of underserved States. (b) Intrastate allocationThe amount allocated for projects within each State under section 3056d of this title shall be allocated among areas in the State in an equitable manner, taking into consideration the State priorities set out in the State plan in