Also, this proposed rule does not have tribal implications under Executive Order 13175 (Consultation and Coordination with Indian Tribal Governments) because it would not have a substantial direct effect on one or more Indian tribes, on the relationship between the Federal Government and Indian tribes, or on the distribution of power and responsibilities between the Federal Government and Indian tribes. If you believe this proposed rule has

or action of the Coast Guard. C. Collection of Information This proposed rule would not call for a new collection of information under the Paperwork Reduction Act of 1995 (44 U.S.C. 3501-3520). D. Federalism and Indian Tribal Governments A rule has implications for federalism under Executive Order 13132

The Unfunded Mandates Reform Act of 1995 (2 U.S.C. 1531-1538) requires Federal agencies to assess the effects of their discretionary regulatory actions. In particular, the Act addresses actions that may result in the expenditure by a State, local, or tribal government, in the aggregate, or by the private sector of $100,000,000 (adjusted for inflation) or more in any one year. Though this proposed rule would not result in such an expenditure, we do discuss the

Indian tribes, please call or email the person listed in the FOR FURTHER INFORMATION CONTACT section. E. Unfunded Mandates Reform Act The Unfunded Mandates Reform Act of 1995 (2 U.S.C. 1531-1538) requires Federal agencies to assess the effects of their discretionary regulatory actions. In particular, the Act addresses

with the fundamental federalism principles and preemption requirements described in Executive Order 13132. Also, this proposed rule does not have tribal implications under Executive Order 13175 (Consultation and Coordination with Indian Tribal Governments) because it would not have a substantial direct effect on one or more Indian tribes, on the relationship between the Federal Government and Indian tribes, or on the

FOR FURTHER INFORMATION CONTACT section. E. Unfunded Mandates Reform Act The Unfunded Mandates Reform Act of 1995 (2 U.S.C. 1531–1538) requires Federal agencies to assess the effects of their discretionary regulatory actions. In particular, the Act addresses actions that may result in the expenditure by a State, local, or Tribal government, in

proposed rule under that Order and have determined that it is consistent with the fundamental federalism principles and preemption requirements described in Executive Order 13132. Also, this proposed rule does not have tribal implications under Executive Order 13175 (Consultation and Coordination with Indian Tribal Governments) because it would not have a substantial direct effect on one or more Indian tribes, on the relationship

78 FR 66838, Nov. 7, 2013; 84 FR 65268, Nov. 27, 2019; 90 FR 27227, June 26, 2025]

1979—Subsec. (d). Pub. L. 96–107 struck out requirement that a non-prior-service person be under 26 years of age. 1978—Subsec. (b). Pub. L. 95–485, in provision preceding cl. (1), substituted "the Secretary of Defense, and by the Secretary of Transportation with respect to the Coast Guard when it is not operating as a service in the Navy" for "the Secretary concerned" and "the Military Selective Service Act (50 U.S.C. App. 451–473)" for "

such date of separation— "(i) has completed 25 years of service as defined under section 8331(12) or 8401(26) of title 5, United States Code; or "(ii) has completed 20 years of such service and is at least 50 years of age. "(2) Notwithstanding any provision of chapter 83 or 84 of title 5, United States Code, an employee

Pub. L. 102–550, title XIV, §1403(a), Oct. 28, 1992, 106 Stat. 4014; amended Pub. L. 104–330, title V, §506(a)(7), Oct. 26, 1996, 110 Stat. 4044;

title 26; or (D) there are no individuals and families in the geographic area who are homeless, in which case the project may serve individuals and families at risk of homelessness. (e) Staff trainingThe Secretary may allow reasonable costs associated with staff training to be included as part of the activities described in subsection (a). (f) Eligibility for permanent

; Pub. L. 100–26, §7(d)(3)(A), Apr. 21, 1987, 101 Stat. 281; Pub. L. 103–355, title I, §1001(1), Oct. 13, 1994, 108 Stat. 3249. The text

section 501(c)(3) of title 26; (6) programs for encouraging and for carrying out energy audits with respect to buildings and industrial facilities (including industrial processes) within the State; (7) programs to promote the adoption of integrated energy plans which provide for— (A) periodic evaluation of a State's energy needs, available energy resources (including greater

section 6103 of Title 26, Internal Revenue Code, repealing sections 296 to 296b, 296d to 296f, 296j, 297h, and 297j of this title, and enacting provisions set out as notes under sections 201 and 298b–5 of this title and

References in Text The Americans with Disabilities Act of 1990, referred to in subsec. (c)(5)(F), is Pub. L. 101–336, July 26, 1990, 104 Stat. 327, which is classified principally to chapter 126

section through the Administration for Native Americans. (2) (A) Not later than 180 days after October 26, 1992, the Secretary shall appoint a panel of experts for the purpose of assisting the Secretary to review— (i) applications submitted under subsection (a); (ii) evaluations carried out to comply with subsection (c)(4); and

Section 501(c)(3) of the Internal Revenue Code of 1986, referred to in subsec. (g)(1), is classified to section 501(c)(3) of Title 26, Internal Revenue Code. Prior Provisions A prior

Codification note set out preceding section 231 of Title 45, section 231t of Title 45, and Tables. The Internal Revenue Code of 1986, referred to in subsec. (d)(1), is classified generally to Title 26, Internal Revenue Code. July 15, 2008, referred to in subsec. (d)(1

section 13 of Pub. L. 104–120, set out as a note under section 1437d of this title. Amendment by Pub. L. 104–99 effective Jan. 26, 1996, only for fiscal years 1996, 1997, and 1998, and to cease to be effective Oct. 21, 1998, see section 402(f) of Pub. L. 104–99, as amended, and

65812\u003c/a\u003e, Oct. 26, 2010, unless otherwise noted.\n"],"link":"/current/title-31/part-1010","title":"Part 1010"}]}

-56\u003c/a\u003e, 115 Stat. 307; sec. 701, \u003ca href=\"https://www.govinfo.gov/link/plaw/114/public/74\" class=\"publ external\" target=\"_blank\" rel=\"noopener noreferrer\"\u003ePub. L. 114-74\u003c/a\u003e, 129 Stat. 599.\n"],"source":["\u003ca href=\"https://www.federalregister.gov/citation/75-FR-65812\" class=\"fr-reference\" data-reference=\"75 FR 65812\"\u003e75 FR 65812\u003c/a\u003e, Oct. 26, 2010, unless otherwise noted.\n"],"link":"/current/title-31/part-1024","title":"Part 1024

under the jurisdiction of the Forest Service or Bureau of Land Management, in lieu of the August 3, 1977, date referred to in paragraph (1) the applicable date shall be August 28, 1974, and November 26, 1980, respectively. (c) PrioritiesExpenditures of moneys for lands, waters, and facilities referred to in subsection (b) shall reflect the following objectives and priorities in the order stated (in lieu of the priorities set forth in

Confirmation of Prescription Release a. Use of Patient Portals and Patient Consent b. Requirement To Maintain Records of Patient Consent 6. Comments About Alternatives to the Confirmation of Prescription Release