State plan does not provide for public announcement regarding air pollution emergency episodes or where the State fails to give any such public announcement, the Administrator will issue a public announcement that an episode stage has been reached. When making such an announcement, the Administrator will be guided by the suggested episode criteria and emission control actions suggested in Appendix L of part 51 of this chapter or those in the approved plan.

(a) [Reserved] (b) The deletion of the following rules or portions of rules is disapproved, since an adequate control strategy demonstration has not been submitted indicating that the deletions of the control requirements contained in those rules would not interfere with the attainment or maintenance of the National Ambient Air Quality Standard for Sulfur Oxides. (1) Lake County Intrastate Region.

(1) The Commission will consider and adopt for public hearing any changes or additions to Regulation No. 1 by February 15, 1981. (2) The proposed regulations will be published in the Colorado Register by March 10, 1981. (3) Public hearing will be held by May 14, 1981. (4) Regulations will be approved with an effective date no later than July 1, 1981, and submitted to

permitting system are submitted to EPA as SIP revisions. (b) The Administrator approves the total suspended particulate regulation for foundry sand processes as submitted and identified under paragraph (c)(22) of this section. This includes only the requirement to remove ninety percent of the particulate matter and not the requirement to emit not more than 0.75 pounds of particulate per ton of material cast, a provision which may be found in state regulation 19-508-18(f)(3

(a) The requirements of §51.230(f) of this chapter are not met since K.R.S. 224.380 of the Air Pollution Control Law of the Commonwealth of Kentucky (June 18, 1970) does not provide for the release, under certain circumstances, of emission data to the public. (b) Delegation of Authority: Pursuant to section 114 of the Act, Kentucky

12 (Upset, Breakdown, or Scheduled Maintenance). (ii) Section 25, Rule 25.1, submitted by the Governor on July 24, 1979. (iii) Section 25, Rules 25.1-25.1.4, submitted by the Governor on November 17, 1981. (iv) Section 25, “Affirmative Defense for Excess Emissions Due to Malfunctions, Startup, and Shutdown,” submitted by the Governor on September 1, 2010.

(a) With the exceptions set forth in this subpart, the Administrator approves New Hampshire's plan as identified in §52.1520 of this subpart for the attainment and maintenance of the national standards under section 110 of the Clean Air Act. Furthermore, the Administrator finds the plans satisfy all requirements of Part D, Title I of the Clean Air Act as amended in

(a) The requirements of §52.14(c)(3) of this chapter as of May 8, 1974 (39 FR 16347), are not met since the plans do not provide for the degree of nitrogen oxides emission reduction attainable through the application of reasonably available control technology in the New York portion of the New Jersey-New York-Connecticut Interstate Region.

(a) Each NSO shall require the smelter owner to use such control measures as may be necessary to ensure that the smelter's fugitive emissions do not result in violations of the NAAQS for SO2 in the smelter's DLA. (b) A smelter which is operating under an NSO containing a SIP compliance schedule established in accordance with

financial records which such agency determines are needed to evaluate the technical or economic merits of the program; (c) Grant physical access to representatives and contractors of each issuing agency to each facility at which such research is conducted; (d) Grant the representatives and contractors of EPA and the issuing agency reasonable access to the persons conducting the program on behalf of the smelter owner for discussions of

The following authorities are withheld by EPA and not transferred to the State, local or tribal agency: (1) Approval of alternatives to the emission limitations in table 2 of this subpart and operating limits established under §60.3023 and table 3 of this subpart. (2) Approval of petitions for specific

(a) Title of Plan: “Illinois Plan for the Control of Sulfuric Acid Mist from Existing Contract Process Sulfuric Acid Plants.” (b) The plan was officially submitted on August 10, 1978. (c) Identification of sources: The plan includes the following sulfuric acid production plants: (1) Beker Industries in LaSalle County. (2) U.S.I. Chemical

On December 7, 1984, and April 23, 1986, Ohio submitted its plan for controlling total reduced sulfur from existing kraft pulp mills, including Rules 3745-73-01, 02, 03, and 04. The plan is being disapproved because: (a) The requirements of §60.24(f) of this chapter are not met because the State failed to justify the application of

(a) You must establish a program for reviewing the information listed in §62.14424 annually with each HMIWI operator (defined in §62.14490). (b) You must conduct your initial review of the information listed in

initial performance testing and operating requirements for thermal oxidizers. (b) You must demonstrate initial compliance with each compliance option, operating requirement, and work practice requirement that applies to you according to Tables 5 and 6 to this subpart and according to §§63.2260 through 63.2269 of this subpart. (c) You must submit the Notification of Compliance Status containing the results of the initial compliance

(a) If you must comply with emission and operating limitations, you must monitor and collect data according to this section. (b) Except for monitor malfunctions, associated repairs, required performance evaluations, and required quality assurance or control activities, you must monitor continuously at all times that the stationary RICE is operating. A monitoring malfunction is any sudden, infrequent, not reasonably preventable failure

You are subject to this subpart if you own or operate an iron and steel foundry that is (or is part of) a major source of hazardous air pollutant (HAP) emissions. Your iron and steel foundry is a major source of HAP for purposes of this subpart if it emits or has the potential to emit any single HAP at a rate of 10 tons or more per year or any combination of HAP at a rate of 25 tons or more per year or if it is located at a facility that emits or has the potential

(a) Except for monitoring malfunctions, out-of-control periods as specified in §63.8(c)(7), associated repairs, and required quality assurance or control activities (including as applicable, calibration checks and required zero and span adjustments), you must monitor continuously (or collect data at all required intervals) at all times an affected source is operating.

(a) You must monitor and collect data according to this section and your site-specific monitoring plan required in §63.7935. (b) Except for monitor malfunctions, associated repairs, and required quality assurance or control activities (including, as applicable, calibration checks and required zero and span adjustments), you must monitor

applicability criteria in §63.11081 at the time you commenced operation. (c) An affected source is reconstructed if you meet the criteria for reconstruction as defined in §63.2. (d) An affected source is an existing affected source if it is not new

(a) On and before April 17, 2012, the terms used in this subpart are defined in the Clean Air Act; §§61.02 and 61.61 of this chapter; and §63.2 for terms used in the applicable provisions of subpart A of this part, as specified in

(b) If you are an owner or operator of an area source subject to this subpart, you are exempt from the obligation to obtain a permit under 40 CFR part 70 or 71, provided you are not required to obtain a permit under 40 CFR 70.3(a) or 71.3(a) for a reason other than your status as an area source under this subpart. You must continue to comply with the provisions of this subpart applicable to area sources.

proceeding under these regulations. (c) The filing of any petition for reconsideration under this part or part 67 or the institution of EPA review of a State determination under part 67 shall not toll the accrual of noncompliance penalties. The penalty will be calculated from the date on which the source owner or operator receives a notice of noncompliance. [45 FR 50110, July 28, 1980, as amended at 57 FR 5329, Feb. 13, 1992

owing from the owner or operator on the due date. Partial payments shall be credited first against the nonpayment penalty, then against the noncompliance penalty. (b) The Administrator shall notify the source owner or operator in writing of the amount of any nonpayment penalty for which the owner or operator is liable. Failure of the Administrator to provide such notice immediately shall not affect the legal obligation of the source owner or operator to pay such

information. (c) The Administrator will serve a copy of the draft permit and the statement of basis on the designated representative of the affected source. (d) The Administrator will provide a 30-day period for public comment, and opportunity to request a public hearing, on the draft permit or denial of a draft permit, in accordance with the public notice required under

Combustion or process sources that are not affected units under §72.6 of this chapter and that are operating and are located in the 48 contiguous States or the District of Columbia may submit an opt-in permit application to become opt-in sources upon issuance of an opt-in permit. Units for which an exemption under

Any party may file a posthearing brief. The presiding officer shall fix the time for filing such briefs (which shall be filed simultaneously), which shall not exceed 60 days from the date the parties received the transcript of the hearing or, if applicable, the stipulated record. Such briefs may be accompanied by proposed findings of fact and conclusions of law. The presiding officer may permit the parties to file responsive briefs. No brief may exceed 30 pages (exclusive of proposed

(a) Any request for records of the Food and Drug Administration, whether it be by letter or by a subpena duces tecum or by any other writing, shall be handled pursuant to the procedures established in subpart B of this part, and shall comply with the rules governing public disclosure established in subparts C, D, E, and F of this part and in other regulations cross-referenced in

(a) Identity and specifications. The color additive D&C Blue No. 4 shall conform in identity and specifications to the requirements of §74.1104(a)(1) and (b). (b) Uses and restrictions. D&C Blue No. 4 may be safely used for coloring externally applied

(a) Identity and specifications. The color additive D&C Green No. 8 shall conform in identity and specifications to the requirements of §74.1208(a)(1) and (b). (b) Uses and restrictions. D&C Green No. 8 may be safely used for coloring externally applied