40 CFR Table 14
Continuous Compliance With the Emission Limitations for Puncture Sealant Application Affected Sources
June 9, 2020
As stated in §63.6008, you must show continuous compliance with the emission limitations for puncture sealant application affected sources according to the following table:
Open Table
| For . . . | You must demonstrate continuous compliance by . . . |
|---|---|
| 1. Each carbon adsorber used to comply with the operating limits in Table 4 to this subpart | a. Monitoring and recording every 15 minutes the total regeneration stream mass or volumetric flow, and the carbon bed temperature after each regeneration, and within 15 minutes of completing any cooling cycle, and b. Maintaining the total regeneration stream mass or volumetric flow, and the carbon bed temperature after each regeneration, and within 15 minutes of completing any cooling cycle within the operating levels established during your performance test. |
| 2. Each thermal oxidizer used to comply with operating limits in Table 4 to this subpart | a. Continuously monitoring and recording the firebox temperature every 15 minutes, and b. Maintaining the daily average firebox temperature within the operating level established during your performance test. |
| 3. Other “add-on” control or capture system hardware used to comply with the operating limits in Table 4 to this subpart | Continuously monitoring and recording specified parameters identified through compliance testing and identified in the Notification of Compliance Status report. |
| 4. Sources complying with the monthly average compliance alternative without using an add-on control device according to §63.5989(c) that are meeting the HAP constituent emission limits in Table 3 to this subpart, option 2 | Demonstrating that the monthly average HAP emissions for each monthly operating period do not exceed the HAP constituent emission limits in Table 3 to this subpart, option 2, determined according to the applicable procedures in §63.6000(c) and (d)(1). |
| 5. Sources complying with the monthly average compliance alternative by using an add-on control device according to §63.5989(d) that are the HAP constituent emission limits in Table 3 to this subpart, option 2 | Demonstrating that the monthly average HAP emissions for each monthly operating period do not exceed the HAP constituent emission limits in Table 3 to this subpart, option 2, determined according to the applicable procedures in §63.6000(c), (d)(2) and (3), and (e) through (g). |
Tried the LawStack mobile app?
Join thousands and try LawStack mobile for FREE today.
- Carry the law offline, wherever you go.
- Download CFR, USC, rules, and state law to your mobile device.
