(a)
(b)
Editorial Notes
References in Text
Subsection (d) of section 125 of this title, referred to in subsec. (b), was repealed by section 301(b)(1) of Pub. L. 99–433.
Prior Provisions
A prior section 191 was renumbered section 202 of this title and subsequently repealed.
Amendments
1987—Subsec. (b). Pub. L. 100–26 substituted "October 1, 1986" for "the date of the enactment of the Goldwater-Nichols Department of Defense Reorganization Act of 1986".
Statutory Notes and Related Subsidiaries
Mission Management Pilot Program
Pub. L. 117–81, div. A, title VIII, §871, Dec. 27, 2021, 135 Stat. 1855, as amended by Pub. L. 118–31, div. A, title VIII, §871, Dec. 22, 2023, 137 Stat. 349, provided that:
"(a)
"(b)
"(1)
"(A)
"(B)
"(2)
"(A) select missions with critical cross-service operational needs; and
"(B) consider—
"(i) the strategic importance of the critical cross-service operational needs to the operational plans of the relevant combatant commands; and
"(ii) the advice of key stakeholders, including the Joint Staff, regarding mission selection.
"(3)
"(A)
"(B)
"(C)
"(4)
"(c)
"(1)
"(2)
"(A) identify critical cross-service, cross-program, and cross-domain operational needs by enumerating the options available to the combatant command responsible for carrying out such mission and determining the resiliency of such options to threats from adversaries;
"(B) in coordination with the military services and appropriate Defense Agencies and Field Activities, develop and deliver solutions, including software and information technology solutions and other functionalities unaligned with any one weapon system of a covered Armed Service, to—
"(i) fulfill critical cross-service, cross-program, and cross-domain operational needs; and
"(ii) address future changes to existing critical cross-service, cross-program, and cross-domain operational needs by providing additional capabilities;
"(C) work with the combatant command responsible for such mission and the related planning organizers, program managers of a covered Armed Force, and defense research and development activities to carry out iterative testing and support to initial operational fielding of the solutions described in subparagraph (B);
"(D) conduct research, development, test, evaluation, and transition support activities with respect to the delivery of the solutions described in subparagraph (B);
"(E) seek to integrate existing, emerging, and new capabilities available to the Department of Defense in the development of the solutions described in subparagraph (B), including by incenting and working with program managers of a covered Armed Force;
"(F) assist the Deputy Secretary of Defense in the identification of funding that could contribute to the mission through existing authorized methods to realign, reprogram, or transfer funds; and
"(G) provide to the Deputy Secretary of Defense mission management activity updates and reporting on the use of funds under the pilot program with respect to such mission.
"(3)
"(A) appointed at the time of mission approval; and
"(B) who may be from any suitable organization, except that the mission manager with respect the initial mission under (b)(3) shall be the Director of the Strategic Capabilities Office.
"(4)
"(5)
"(d)
"(1) developing and sharing best practices for applying emerging technology and supporting new operational concepts to improve outcomes on key military missions and operational challenges; and
"(2) providing information to the leadership of the Department on the implementation of the pilot program and related policy issues.
"(e)
"(1) the authorities required by the mission managers to effectively and efficiently carry out the pilot program with respect to the missions selected under subsection (b); and
"(2) whether the mission managers have access to sufficient funding to carry out the research, development, test, evaluation, and support to initial operational fielding activities required to deliver solutions fulfilling the critical cross-service, cross-program, and cross-domain operational needs of the missions.
"(f)
"(1)
"(A)
"(B)
"(i) the actions taken to implement the pilot program;
"(ii) an assessment of the pilot program;
"(iii) requests for Congress to provide authorities required to successfully carry out the pilot program; and
"(iv) a description of the data plan required under subsection (d).
"(2)
"(A) the data collected and analysis performed under subsection (d);
"(B) lessons learned;
"(C) the priorities for future activities of the pilot program; and
"(D) such other information as the Deputy Secretary determines appropriate.
"(3)
"(A) a written assessment of the pilot program;
"(B) a written recommendation on continuing or expanding the mission integration pilot program;
"(C) requests for Congress to provide authorities required to successfully carry out the pilot program; and
"(D) the data collected and analysis performed under subsection (d).
"(g)
"(h)
"(i)
"(j)
"(1)
"(A) the Army;
"(B) the Navy;
"(C) the Air Force;
"(D) the Marine Corps; or
"(E) the Space Force.
"(2)
"(3)
"(4)
"(4)[(5)]
"(5)[(6)]
"(6)[(7)]
"(7)[(8)]
"(8)[(9)]
Establishment of Mission-Oriented Pilot Programs To Close Significant Capabilities Gaps
Pub. L. 117–81, div. A, title VIII, §872, Dec. 27, 2021, 135 Stat. 1859, provided that:
"(a)
"(b)
"(1) seek to address specific outstanding operational challenges of high importance to the operational plans of the United States Indo-Pacific Command and the United States European Command;
"(2) be designed to leverage industry cost sharing by using sources such as private equity and venture capital funding to develop technologies and overall capabilities that resolve significant capability gaps for delivery to the Department of Defense, as a product or as a service;
"(3) not later than three years after the date on which the pilot program commences, demonstrate the efficacy of the solutions being developed under the pilot program;
"(4) deliver an operational capability not later than five years after the pilot program commences;
"(5) provide an operationally relevant solution for—
"(A)(i) maintaining resilient aircraft operations in and around Guam in the face of evolving regional threats, including large salvo supersonic and hypersonic missile threats; or
"(ii) an operational challenge of similar strategic importance and relevance to the responsibilities and plans of the United States Indo-Pacific Command or the United States European Command; and
"(B)(i) providing a resilient logistic and resupply capability in the face of evolving regional threats, including operations within an anti-access-area denial environment; or
"(ii) an operational challenge of similar strategic importance and relevance to the responsibilities and plans of the United States Indo-Pacific Command; and
"(6) incorporate—
"(A) existing and planned Department of Defense systems and capabilities to achieve mission objectives; and
"(B) to the extent practicable, technologies that have military applications and the potential for nonmilitary applications.
"(c)
"(1)
"(A) assign mission managers or program managers—
"(i) to coordinate and collaborate with entities awarded contracts or agreements under the pilot program, parties to cost sharing agreements for such awarded contracts or agreements, combatant commands, and military departments to define mission requirements and solutions; and
"(ii) to coordinate and monitor pilot program implementation;
"(B) provide technical assistance for pilot program activities, including developing and implementing metrics, which shall be used—
"(i) to assess each operational challenge such pilot programs are addressing; and
"(ii) to characterize the resilience of solutions being developed under the pilot programs to known threats and single points of failure;
"(C) provide operational use case expertise to the entities awarded contracts or agreements under the pilot program and parties to cost sharing agreements for such awarded contracts or agreements;
"(D) serve as the liaison between the Armed Forces, the combatant commanders, and the participants in the pilot programs; and
"(E) use flexible acquisition practices and authorities, including—
"(i) the authorities under section[s] 2371 and 2371b of title 10, United States Code [now 10 U.S.C. 4021, 4022];
"(ii) payments for demonstrated progress;
"(iii) authorities under the Defense Production Act of 1950 (50 U.S.C. 4501 et seq.); and
"(iv) other acquisition practices that support efficient and effective access to emerging technologies and capabilities, including technologies and capabilities from companies funded with private investment.
"(2)
"(d)
"(e)
"(1) developing and sharing best practices for achieving goals established for the pilot programs; and
"(2) providing information to the Secretary and the congressional defense committees on—
"(A) the implementation of the pilot programs; and
"(B) related policy issues.
"(f)
"(g)
"(h)
"(1)
"(A) the Army;
"(B) the Navy;
"(C) the Air Force;
"(D) the Marine Corps; or
"(E) the Space Force.
"(2)
"(3)
Actions To Increase the Efficiency and Transparency of the Defense Logistics Agency
Pub. L. 115–232, div. A, title IX, §924, Aug. 13, 2018, 132 Stat. 1931, provided that:
"(a)
"(1) a comprehensive system that enables customers of the Agency to view—
"(A) the inventory of items and materials available to customers from the Agency; and
"(B) the delivery status of items and materials that are in transit to customers; and
"(2) a predictive analytics capability designed to increase the efficiency of the system described in paragraph (1) by identifying emerging customer needs with respect to items and materials supplied by the Agency, including any emerging needs arising from the use of new weapon systems by customers.
"(b)
"(1) develop a plan to reduce the rates charged by the Agency to customers, in aggregate—
"(A) by not less than 10 percent; or
"(B) if the Chief Management Officer determines that a reduction of rates in aggregate of 10 percent or more will create overall inefficiencies for the Department, by such percentage less than 10 percent as the Chief Management Officer considers appropriate to avoid such inefficiencies, but only after notifying the congressional defense committees [Committees on Armed Services and Appropriations of the Senate and the House of Representatives] of such lesser percentage in reduction of rates pursuant to this subparagraph;
"(2) eliminate the duplication of services within the Agency; and
"(3) establish specific goals and metrics to ensure that the Agency is fulfilling its mission of providing items and materials to customers with sufficient speed and in sufficient quantities to ensure the lethality and readiness of warfighters.
"(c)
Comptroller General Review of Operations of Defense Logistics Agency
Pub. L. 106–398, §1 [[div. A], title IX, §917], Oct. 30, 2000, 114 Stat. 1654, 1654A-232, directed the Comptroller General to review the operations of the Defense Logistics Agency and to submit to committees of Congress one or more reports setting forth the Comptroller General's findings not later than Feb. 1, 2002.
Comptroller General Review of Operations of Defense Information Systems Agency
Pub. L. 106–398, §1 [[div. A], title IX, §918], Oct. 30, 2000, 114 Stat. 1654, 1654A-232, directed the Comptroller General to review the operations of the Defense Information Systems Agency and to submit to committees of Congress one or more reports setting forth the Comptroller General's findings not later than Feb. 1, 2002.
Reassessment of Defense Agencies and Department of Defense Field Activities
Pub. L. 99–433, title III, §303, Oct. 1, 1986, 100 Stat. 1023, directed Secretary of Defense to conduct a study of functions and organizational structure of Defense Agencies and Department of Defense Field Activities to determine the most effective, economical, or efficient means of providing supply or service activities common to more than one military department, with Secretary to submit a report to Congress not later than Oct. 1, 1987. The report was to include a study of improved application of computer systems to functions of Defense Agencies and Department of Defense Field Activities, including a plan for rapid replacement, where necessary, of existing automated data processing equipment with new equipment, and plans to achieve reductions in total number of members of Armed Forces and civilian employees assigned or detailed to permanent duty in Defense Agencies and Department of Defense Field Activities (other than National Security Agency) by 5 percent, 10 percent, and 15 percent of total number of such members and employees projected to be assigned or detailed to such duty on Sept. 30, 1988, together with a discussion of implications of each such reduction and a draft of any legislation that would be required to implement each such plan.