://www.regulations.gov website. Although listed in the index, some information is not publicly available, e.g., Confidential Business Information or other information whose disclosure is restricted by statute. Certain other material, such as copyrighted material, is not placed on the internet and will be publicly available only in hard copy form. Publicly available docket materials are available electronically through https://www.regulations.gov.

the SMA may be able to aggregate the MTA across each of their SMAs and centralize the management of collateral for all of their SMAs, which may result in increased netting among the SMAs and the CSE, and more efficient collateral management. Other SMA owners, however, do not have the capability to manage the calculation and aggregation of MTA across their SMAs. In the GMAC Subcommittee Report, the GMAC subcommittee stated that

(1) Make at least 5 replicate coastdowns in each direction from 70 to 60 km/h on a smooth, level track under balanced wind conditions. The driver must have a mass of 80 ±10 kg and be in the normal driving position. Record the coastdown time. (2) Average the coastdown times. Adjust the dynamometer load so that the coastdown time is duplicated with the vehicle and driver on the dynamometer. (3) Alternate

, Steep Creek, Stud Creek, Warren Creek, Webfoot Creek, West Fork Chamberlain Creek, West Fork Rattlesnake Creek, West Horse Creek, Whimstick Creek, Wind River, Woods Fork Horse Creek. (xix) MIDDLE SALMON-PANTHER BASIN: Allen Creek, Arnett Creek, Beaver Creek, Big Deer Creek, Blackbird Creek, Boulder Creek, Cabin Creek, Camp Creek, Carmen Creek, Clear Creek, Colson Creek, Copper Creek, Corral Creek, Cougar Creek, Cow Creek, Deadhorse Creek, Deep Creek, East

loss that cannot be prevented, including, but not limited to, hail, wind, excess sun causing sunburn, and frost and freeze causing russeting. (b) In addition to the causes of loss excluded in section 12 of the Basic Provisions, we will not insure against damage or loss of production due to your inability to market the apples for any reason other than actual physical damage from an insurable cause specified in this section. For example, we will not pay you an indemnity if you are unable to

will adversely affect water quality if not treated or buried. Such material shall be disposed in accordance with the provision of §717.14(e); (2) Preventing or removing water from contact with toxic-producing deposits; (3) Burying or otherwise treating all toxic or harmful materials within 30 days if such materials are subject to wind

the Captain of the Port. (ii) When sustained wind speeds exceed 40 knots, all anchored commercial vessels greater than 1600 gross tons shall ensure their propulsion plant is placed in immediate standby and a second anchor is made ready to let go. Vessels unable to comply with this requirement must immediately notify the Captain of the Port. In such case, the Captain of the Port may require the vessel to have one or more tugs standing by to render immediate

facilities and for crude oil tankers while in Prince William Sound and Cook Inlet; (C) study wind and water currents and other environmental factors in the vicinity of the terminal facilities which may affect the ability to prevent, respond to, contain, and clean up an oil spill; (D) identify highly sensitive areas which may require specific protective measures in the event of a spill in Prince William Sound or Cook Inlet;

. See the Federal eRulemaking Portal website (https://www.regulations.gov) for additional instructions on providing comments via the portal. All comments submitted directly to the USPTO or provided on the Federal eRulemaking Portal should include the docket number (PTO-T-2019-0027). Although comments may be submitted by postal mail, the USPTO prefers to receive comments electronically because the Office may more easily

870.3700 Prenatal Developmental toxicity - rat and rabbit, preferred R R TGAI TGAI 22, 23, 24, 25, 26 870.3800

[51 FR 40642, Nov. 7, 1986, as amended at 52 FR 21017, June 4, 1987; 53 FR 31221, Aug. 17, 1988; 54 FR 36972, Sept. 6, 1989; 56 FR 12355, Mar. 25, 1991; 61 FR 55727, Oct. 28, 1996; 62 FR 26025, May 12, 1997; 62 FR 64509, Dec. 5, 1997; 63 FR 28738, May 26, 1998; 64 FR 28391, May 26, 1999; 66 FR 33890, June 26, 2001; 67 FR 35928, May 22, 2002; 67 FR 36818, May 28, 2002; 69 FR 6575, Feb. 11, 2004; 69 FR 67653, Nov. 19, 2004; 70 FR 34589, June 14, 2005

(10) Legal entityThe term "legal entity" means— (A) an entity described in section 501(c)(3) of title 26 and exempt from tax under section 501(a) of such title; (B) an instrumentality of State or local

)(5). (i) Reports and records, compliance with requirements based on best effortsWhen the treasurer of a political committee shows that best efforts have been used to obtain, maintain, and submit the information required by this Act for the political committee, any report or any records of such committee shall be considered in compliance with this Act or chapter 95 or chapter 96 of title 26.

The EASA AD applies to Model AS350BB helicopters, whereas this proposed AD does not because that model is not FAA type-certificated. The EASA AD directs the operators to contact Airbus Helicopters for repairs if more than one screw head is missing, whereas this proposed AD does not. Interim Action The FAA considers this proposed AD to be an interim action

proposed AD. According to the manufacturer, all of the costs of this proposed AD will be covered under warranty, thereby reducing the cost impact on affected persons. The FAA does not control warranty coverage for affected persons. As a result, the FAA has included all known costs in the cost estimate. Authority for This Rulemaking

described previously is likely to exist or develop in other products of the same type design. Proposed AD Requirements This proposed AD would require installation of a software update to the aircraft navigation database and insertion of a change to the applicable AFM. Costs of Compliance The FAA estimates that this

safety in air commerce. This regulation is within the scope of that authority because it addresses an unsafe condition that is likely to exist or develop on products identified in this rulemaking action. This proposed AD is issued in accordance with authority delegated by the Executive Director, Aircraft Certification Service, as authorized by FAA Order 8000.51C. In accordance with that order, issuance of ADs is normally a function

the nut and its bolt from service. Costs of Compliance The FAA estimates that this proposed AD affects 23 helicopters of U.S. Registry. Labor costs are estimated at $85 per work-hour. Based on these numbers, the FAA estimates the following costs to comply with this proposed AD. Determining the adjusted life limit for the bolts and

The FAA has determined that this proposed AD would not have federalism implications under Executive Order 13132. This proposed AD would not have a substantial direct effect on the States, on the relationship between the national Government and the States, or on the distribution of power and responsibilities among the various levels of government. For the reasons discussed

and responsibilities among the various levels of government. For the reasons discussed above, I certify this proposed regulation: (1) Is not a “significant regulatory action” under Executive Order 12866, (2) Will not affect intrastate aviation in Alaska, and

$2,805 $2,805 The FAA has received no definitive data that would enable the agency to provide cost estimates for the on-condition replacements specified in this proposed AD. Open Table

$1,530 per inspection $241,740 per inspection. The FAA estimates the following costs to do any necessary on-condition inspections that would be required. The FAA has no way of determining the number of aircraft that might need these on-condition actions:

26 U.S.C. 501 or by any organization providing such a benefit under a contract with the Government. (iii) Educators from non-government, non-commercial organizations expert in personal financial affairs and their materials may, with appropriate disclaimers, provide the educational programs and information required by this part if approved by a Presidentially-appointed, Senate-confirmed

In making these determinations, I have considered the factors set forth in section 490 of the Act, based on the information contained in the International Narcotics Control Strategy Report of 2001. Given that the performance of each of these countries has differed, I have attached an explanatory statement for each of the countries subject to this determination [not set

), substituted "479" for "409" in introductory provisions. Subsec. (k). Pub. L. 112–81, §631(e)(26), added subsec. (k). 2002—Subsec. (a). Pub. L. 107–314, §622(a), substituted "two privately owned motor vehicles" for "one privately owned motor vehicle" in introductory and concluding provisions. Subsec. (i). Pub. L. 107–314, §622(b), inserted at end

the primary and secondary standards from 0.075 to 0.070 parts per million (80 FR 65292, October 26, 2015). On September 30, 2019, and as supplemented on April 3, 2020, the Washington Department of Ecology (Ecology) submitted SIP revisions to meet certain 2010 SO2 and 2015 ozone NAAQS infrastructure requirements. We note that Ecology previously submitted a SIP revision on February 7, 2018, addressing CAA section 110(a)(2)(D)(i)(I) (interstate transport prongs 1 and 2) for the 2010 SO

19-26 “San Joaquin Valley Agricultural Equipment Incentive Measure,” as amended by “Additional Clarifying Information for the San Joaquin Valley Agricultural Equipment Incentive Measure.” 12/12/19 02/11/20 We find that